Land Sharing, Land Sparing

A recent article from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) presents the complexity of the land use choice between multi-functional agro-ecosystems and agricultural intensification plus land preservation. Traditionally, there has been little or no middle ground between the dichotomous “land sharing” and “land sparing” camps. But this article proposes that the issue is not so black-and-white. A recent study of oil palm plantations in the Peruvian Amazon demonstrated that intensive industrial practices can still lead to agricultural expansion, and that land tenure and rights may have more impact on the clearing of old growth forests. In fact, the land put under cultivation in the smallholder setting was previously farmed land and not primary forest. So, it seems the drivers behind clear-cutting may not be so clear-cut after all. And multifunctional landscapes may find their way into more of the conservation conversations.

This entry was posted in Staying Current and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Land Sharing, Land Sparing

  1. Any monoculture in the tropical climax or degraded forest zone will be disastrous. Association and adaptation must have to be considered. Habit and habitat of the plants must be respected.

  2. Thank you for highlighting this new study. Readers might be interested in a related discussion on our blog at http://ideas4sustainability.wordpress.com/?s=phalan
    Best wishes — Joern